[BEST SELLERS]: Book 4 Checkpoint 2: Bill O'Reilly's Writing

If you haven't heard of him, Bill O'Reilly is a political analyst who stars on "The O'Reilly Factor", a political TV show that presents news regarding U.S. politics, as well as foreign relations or actions.

But that's not all O'Reilly does, he writes books as well. Some are political, but one of the most well known series he has written, with Martin Dugard, is the Killing series, four books by the names of Killing Lincoln, Killing Kennedy, Killing Patton, which I read along with Killing Lincoln, and lastly, Killing Jesus. People have a lot to say about O'Reilly and Dugard's writing. Some people say his writing style doesn't appeal to most readers. Others say his books are totally untrue, which I only believe partially.

One of O'Reilly and Dugard's books, Killing Jesus, has been criticized as being "fiction", on many fronts, or websites. On one website, salon.com, writer Robert M. Price released an article about it, titled: "Bill O'Reilly's Killing Jesus is fiction: Fact-checking the Fox News' anchor's "history" of Jesus's death". The article states that the principles in Killing Jesus don't work because, according to the writer, only fits with the other three books in the series.

I believe that O'Reilly's writing style is a little weird, but it somewhat makes sense, because if he didn't use the writing style he did, we wouldn't have a clue what happened in the 1940's, 1860's, or further back into the past.

In conclusion, I do believe Bill O'Reilly's writing style is justified, and if people are criticizing his writing in Killing Jesus, think about it, Jesus's story is historical. so why not write it historically?